@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

TSG_Asmodeus

@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

More good news from the BCNDP, it’s nice to have something politically going well for us all.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

According to the article:

The air quality improvement was driven by reductions in fuel demand and by people switching to public transport from private vehicles, the study says.

Rise of B.C. Conservatives puts B.C. United on shaky ground — to the NDP's advantage, experts say (www.cbc.ca)

The Conservative Party of B.C. has made a “splash” in its return to the Legislature, said political scientist Gerald Baier — but whether that will be followed by strong numbers come election time remains to be seen....

TSG_Asmodeus OP , (edited )
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

For sure – what will be interesting is to see how it translates federally, because the BC NDP are still a little closer to the (Federal) Liberals and then (Federal) NDP.

As far as I know the BCPC haven’t hit 40% in ages, have they?

EDIT: BCPC

TSG_Asmodeus OP ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Sorry, I’ll edit that haha, the BCPC.

TSG_Asmodeus OP ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

I think the question is less what the CPBC will do, but what the.,… what the hell are the BC Liberals called now? (Looks it up…) The question is what the “BC United” (lol) party will do.

You’ve got a Left party (arguably left on centre in some areas) that is absolutely dominating, getting dangerously (for the Right Wing) close to 50%. You’ve got the CPBC going, as you said, full ‘MAGA’ Canada. So what will the BCU do to get more votes?

I have a sinking feeling they’ll both try to out ‘Conservative’ each other, leading to an issue like Alberta has where you suddenly have a radically right-wing, owned-by-megacorporations party in charge of an entire province.

TSG_Asmodeus OP ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

I don’t think I’d call United ‘centrist.’ Centre-Right, maybe, but in 2020 they sure came out swinging as Cons. Jane Thornthwaite and Laurie Throness alone made them look like (Canada Light) American Republicans.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

I cannot believe a subreddit run by an avowed Neo-Nazi would do such a thing…

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Here’s the imgur link with the proof (“Perma” is the mod of r/Canada). They removed him, but a mystery brand new user was immediately added as a mod.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

I was (temp) banned because I called Conservatives as ‘Cons’ (but not for Libs, NDP, etc). They are very delicate, fragile people.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Maybe not payroll, but…

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

I’ve been through this a few times: Usenet, Digg, Reddit. They started off small and stayed mostly civil even though there is a wide range of opinion. Then they start growing rapidly and people see an opportunity to “get their message out”, whether that’s spam, personal aggrandizement, a political message, or whatever: exploitation vs participation. After a while it becomes just too much for some people, so they find somewhere else to congregate.

But is this a bad thing? Even if Lemmy ‘doesn’t survive’ (which I think is a fair way off, personally) something else will take its place. Something always does; ICQ dies, people move to AOL. Digg dies, people go to reddit, Myspace to Facebook and so on. Look at the absolute graveyards of websites where people used to congregate and play games and talk: Battle.net, Mplayer, WON.net, Digg, Usenet, AOL messenger, ICQ, Myspace, there are dozens of these things that, at the time, we felt like would always be there.

Enjoy it while it’s here. Make it the best place you can.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar
TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

This link explains it pretty well. It’s a specific thing, in terms of size, impact, etc, and is occurring much more, and in much larger size, as climate change moves along.

TSG_Asmodeus OP , (edited )
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

…canada.ca/…/intimate-partner-violence.html

Police-reported data (2019):

  • In Canada in 2019, of the 107,810 people aged 15 and over who experienced intimate partner violence (IPV) 79% were women
  • As in previous years, 2019 rates of IPV were more than 3.5 times higher among women than among men (536 versus 149 per 100,000 population)

Overall, 44% of women who had ever been in an intimate partner relationship—or about 6.2 million women aged 15 and over —reported experiencing some kind of psychological, physical, or sexual abuse in the context of an intimate relationship in their lifetime (since the age of 15). More specifically, women were significantly more likely than men to have experienced any form of IPV, including physical abuse (23% versus 17%, respectively), sexual abuse (12% versus 2%), and psychological abuse (43% versus 35%)

Women, relative to men, were considerably more likely to have experienced the most severe forms of IPV in their lifetime (since the age of 15): being made to perform sex acts they did not want to perform (8% versus 1%), being confined or locked in a room or other space (3% versus 0.5%), being forced to have sex (10% versus 2%), being choked (7% versus 1%), and having harm or threats of harm directed towards their pets (4% versus 0.8%).

Intimate partner homicide

Between 2014 and 2019, there were 497 victims of intimate partner homicide, and—similar to intimate partner violence in general—80% (400 victims) were women.

More details in the link up top.

Will you allow experts to call it an epidemic now?

(EDIT: Downvoting stats, huh. Welcome, reddit users.)

TSG_Asmodeus OP ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Not convenient RE: the (minority) they want to target.

They’ll keep hating what the rich tell them to hate; all we can do is bullwark against it.

TSG_Asmodeus OP ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Oh you’re right, it really is a big deal. The precedent is massive; I hope the cops get taken to the cleaners. The fact we can send ERT’s with C8’s and full combat gear to arrest a bunch of older ladies trying to defend their land, but somehow were completely incapable of stopping the Convoy terrorism in downtown Ottawa, is very, very disturbing.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

At the end of the day, you could provide every single homeless person with a home and half would willingly go back to the streets.

Gonna need a source for that, my man.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Are you honestly unaware of the concepts of people who chose to be homeless? It’s a pretty documented thing.

Feel free to provide some of said documentation.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Ok it’s made up, got it.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

there is a percentage of homeless yhat will either refuse shelter or leave soon afterward.

Yeah, ‘there’s a percentage’ of any group that won’t accept help. The idea we just don’t do something because some of the people won’t accept help is insane. We’d literally never do anything ever. I was responding to:

At the end of the day, you could provide every single homeless person with a home and half would willingly go back to the streets.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Yes many people take the help, but yes many people choose to be homeless.

Again, so we let them all freeze to death because some might choose to be homeless? This is a nonsensical argument. We don’t remove seatbelt laws because some people don’t wear them.

I live in Vancouver, I’ve been near the DTES my entire life, and have worked in the area repeatedly. I know how bad it is.

I’d love a single person here to explain how not helping these people survive the winter is going to be a positive thing. All these people are asking is to not kick them out of encampments until they won’t die of fucking exposure. If we don’t have the housing for them, what the fuck else are they supposed to do?

Nothing has made me less proud to be from here than the reactions I read to people who are homeless. Just gross.

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

when confronted with a hurdle in the homeless population, you simply ignore it and say it doesn’t exist while plugging your ears.

I didn’t say it didn’t exist, I took your quote just shrugging off doing anything because ‘half’ (lol) of people won’t accept help, and said “Hey what if we didn’t throw all of them out to die if some of them don’t want help.”

What a sad, self-centred view you have, where you can just plug your ears to people begging for help because you can demonize some of them.

Fantastic to hear from the NIMBY crowd though, sorry you have to suffer watching others suffer in your view sometimes.

TSG_Asmodeus OP ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

However, the project’s scope excludes spending by the Vancouver Police Department, Vancouver Park Board and Vancouver Public Library.

“Lol”

With Sovereignty Act, Danielle Smith serves as judge, jury and power company executive (www.cbc.ca)

There. Boom. After repeatedly warning she would, the premier has wielded the Sovereignty Act, designed to keep Ottawa from encroaching on the province’s right to produce its oil and gas resources, or in the case of the electricity sector, burning them to keep the lights on....

TSG_Asmodeus ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

In a 2021 B.C. Supreme Court ruling, Justice Douglas Thompson rebuked the RCMP for the use of exclusion zones to control the movement of journalists, calling the tactic “unlawful.”

But at a police board meeting Thursday, the board decided to close the complaint after hearing from VPD Supt. Don Chapman. Chapman told the board that while the VPD had closed the street for one block between Columbia and Main on the morning of April 5, that did not constitute an exclusion zone.

Lol, Jesus Christ. Is this guy the head of the Ministry of Truth?

TSG_Asmodeus OP ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Well now we know he’s watching Fox news, chose anti-vaxx/Convoy, is using American anti-2SLGBTQ+ talking points, used misogynist tags on youtube, and what’s this, Cons met with a Far-Right German politician with Pro-Putin views. Oh, and after condemning that far-Right politician, Poilievre did what to the Cons who met with him? Oh, nothing.

So the siding with Russia stuff is really already happening, but this does add more fuel to that fire.

TSG_Asmodeus OP ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Wow, there’s some serious paranoia here. When you shout Russian agents that easily you start to sound a bit like McCarthy.

I think most people are likely referring to this. Basically, its already been shown that Russia has influenced people here.

TSG_Asmodeus OP ,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Because it’s working for him. Right-wing voters adore him, regardless of his misinformation, lying, etc.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • test
  • dhbit
  • random
  • All magazines